Parent and Worker Expectation and Experiences of
Early Childhood Education and Childcare for Families
with
Special Needs
Project Team
Project Funding
NSW Department of Education and Training
NSW Department of Community Services
Department of Disability, Ageing, and Home Care
Overview
This project is jointly funded by the NSW Department
of Community Services, the NSW Department of Ageing,
Disability and Home Care Services and the NSW Department
of Education and Training.
The inclusion of children with special needs in early
childhood education and childcare services is supported
on humanistic, legal and scientific grounds. Inclusion
is promoted as both a desirable outcome and a means
of redressing the impact of social/environmental disadvantage
on children and their families. A number of barriers
to inclusion exist, including, but not limited to (a)
differing beliefs or the lack of any clear consensus
on what constitutes successful inclusion; and in this
connection, (b) difficulty establishing and maintaining
effective collaboration between parents, mainstream
and specialist service providers. Currently, there is
scant evidence to guide policy makers and providers
in how to overcome these barriers and make inclusion
work for all involved. This project, therefore, has
the overall aim of ascertaining how families with children
with special needs can be engaged and an effective collaboration
between parents, mainstream and specialist service providers
nurtured.
The objectives of the study are:
- To determine what successful inclusion and
effective collaboration mean to parents of
children with special needs and to mainstream and
specialist service providers
- To identify the expectations of these parents, mainstream
and specialist service providers, including:
- what the parties involved expect from each other,
and,
- how the child and family is expected to benefit.
- To explore the experiences of these parents, mainstream
and specialist service providers with a view to:
- determining the extent to which expectations
have been met
- identifying factors inhibiting and those promoting
successful inclusion and effective collaboration.
Approach
- methodology
- theoretical perspectives
The conceptual framework for the research project comes
from ecocultural theory (Tharp & Gallimore, 1988
, Gallimore et al., 1993 ). This theory proposes that
experiences and expectations occur within a broader
cultural and ecological context. There is a constant
marrying of culture, ecology, and human experience.
To put this simply - a two way flow - between the person,
the ecological contexts of home, family, school, work
and so on and the surrounding culture. The ecocultural
(ecological and cultural) context is central in influencing
both the objective conditions surrounding experiences
and expectations, as well as the subjective meanings
these hold for those involved.
The question then is how do we understand the ecocultural
context of early childhood services - and furthermore
- the objective conditions and subjective meanings held
by families with special needs and early childhood service
workers?
Ecocultural theory proposes that ecological and cultural
effects are mediated through activity settings. Activity
settings provide a lens through which we can explore
and gain insights into people's expectations and experiences
of particular situations, in this instance, families
with special needs and early childhood services.
Gallimore and his colleagues have operationalised activity
settings to guide empirical research (Gallimore &
Goldenberg, 1993 ). There are five variables to be considered:
- Personnel present during an activity
- Salient cultural values and beliefs
- Operations and task demands of the activities themselves
- Scripts for conduct that govern participants' actions
- Purposes or motives of the participants
This framework of five activity setting variables provides
a way to investigate the issues of concern, i.e. families
with special needs accessing, making decisions about,
and maintaining their involvement with early childhood
services.
For the purpose of this research project, activity
settings are arranged under three broad headings as
follows:
- Deciding/ Exploring Options
- Engaging/ Negotiating/ Finding the 'best fit'
- Maintaining Involvement
Research Design
Case study is the method of choice for this research
project. This will permit in-depth exploration of family
and worker experiences and expectations in particular
early childhood service contexts. Narrative based, semi-structured
interviews will be conducted with a purposefully selected
sample of families and early childhood service workers.
The interviews will explore expectations and experiences
using the activity setting concept and the three broad
headings noted above.
At the conclusion of each interview an Expectation
Rating Sheet will be completed in part to summarise
and clarify information discussed and in part to provide
a measure on which we can aggregate data about family
and workers expectations, the relative importance of
these and the degree to which these have been met.
If possible, we will review any formal documents relating
to the child's programme. This will provide an additional
data source on early childhood services content and
processes.
Anticipated Outcomes
This research project is due for completion late 2003.
It is also anticipated that this research will provide
sound empirical evidence upon which a competitive ARC
Linkage Grant proposal can be developed in 2004, to
investigate outcomes for children with special needs
and their families included in early childhood services.
Related Publications - state FSSP ones
Llewellyn, G., Thompson, K., & Fante, M. (2002)
Inclusion in Early Childhood Services: Ongoing Challenges
Australian Journal of Early Childhood 27 (3)
18 - 23.
Llewellyn, G. & Fante, M. (1999) Young Children
with Disabilities in NSW Children's Services Office
of Childcare: NSW Department of Community Services
A summary of this project can also be found in NSW
Department of Community Services (2000) Insights
Into Research: Four Studies on Early Childhood Issues
and Children's Services pp. 93 - 122.
|